Prediction of Miomir Kecmanovic [48th] vs Botic Van De Zandschulp [89th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W L L W
Form
L W L W W L L W L WHead To Head: Kecmanovic 1 - 2 Zandschulp
They have played 7 sets in total, with Kecmanovic winning 3 and Zandschulp winning 4. The last match between Kecmanovic and Zandschulp was at the National Bank Open - Montreal, 09-08-2022, First, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | 1 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 2 |
| Kecmanovic | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (14-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (9-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 48 | Ranking | 89 |
| 27 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 25 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 57% (309-234) | Career Total W/L | 62% (362-225) |
| $4,821,335 | Career Prize Money | $3,420,360 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Kecmanovic VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
85 of
124)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
124)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
84%
(
21 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
19%
(
12 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Kecmanovic VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 36 | Games Won | 39 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 20 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:55:15 | Average Match Time | 1:55:15 |
| 66% (158/239) | 1st Serve % | 66% (154/234) |
| 63% (99/158) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (103/154) |
| 59% (48/81) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (41/80) |
| 41% (9/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (10/23) |
| 38% (90/234) | Return Points Win % | 38% (92/239) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kecmanovic 1 - 2 Zandschulp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kecmanovic has won 47.77% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 43.6%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kecmanovic, in recent form, has won 48.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 46.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.96% and 27.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kecmanovic has saved 54.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 51.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kecmanovic has won 50.82% of matches played (W/L 31/ 30), with Zandschulp winning 51.47% (W/L 35/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kecmanovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 120/ 76), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 16/ 19). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Kecmanovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 15/ 14), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Kecmanovic winning 1 times and Zandschulp being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Kecmanovic winning 3 and Zandschulp winning 4. The last match between Kecmanovic and Zandschulp was at the National Bank Open - Montreal, 09-08-2022, First, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kecmanovic and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kecmanovic winning 0 times and Zandschulp 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Kecmanovic winning 1, and Zandschulp 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kecmanovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 109.92 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 147.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kecmanovic has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kecmanovic has converted 29.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 30.99% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Best Odds For The Match
Miomir Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Marcos Giron
64%
(
78 of
121)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
126)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
6-2 6-7(2) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
57%
(
62 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
12
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
15
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Alex Michelsen
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Kecmanovic vs Zandschulp?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Kecmanovic Vs Zandschulp is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (309/234) | Win/Loss | 62% (362/225) |
| 55% (735/595) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (824/587) |
| 52% (6659/6109) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7072/6249) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 1961 | Aces Total | 2868 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1070 | Total Double Faults | 2129 |
| 1:40:6 | Average Match Time | 1:35:31 |
| 147.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 178.14 |
| 60% (23314/38539) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23889/38801) |
| 70% (16342/23314) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17067/23889) |
| 53% (8099/15220) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7187/14915) |
| 41% (1501/3644) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1769/4107) |
| 38% (15049/39215) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16274/40003) |
| 57% (277/484) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (335/536) |
| 50% (26/52) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 47% (109/231) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (100/180) |
| 51% (85/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (112/194) |
| 82% (324/267) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (341/302) |
| 18% (324/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (341/38) |
| 19% (219/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (244/59) |
See recent tennis photos of Kecmanovic and Zandschulp
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Miomir Kecmanovic
View full predicted draw for Kecmanovic in Munich
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
View full predicted draw for Zandschulp in Munich
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
